|
SportsInsights.com Article -- Money Management
and Bet Size:
Thoughts on a Simple Approach to Improve
Portfolio Balance (July 2008)
With the lull
before football season -- and especially with baseball the only
game in town -- we thought we would throw some ideas on money
management and bet size out there for our members. Many
sports like football and basketball use a point spread.
This "evens" the game out so that the bets are often
close to even odds. Most bettors bet at -110 odds or -105
at "low-vig" sportsbooks. Sometimes, the actual
odds are adjusted dynamically so that you can pay as much as
-125 or even get "plus odds" of +110 or so.
Nevertheless, these are close enough to "even odds" so
that your bet size doesn't need
to vary.
On the other
hand, in moneyline sports such as baseball and hockey, you will
sometimes get underdog odds of +150 or +200 or more. Other
times, you might like a favorite and lay -130 or even -150
(hopefully not more than that!). Or -- perhaps you like to
bet boxing, horses, or tennis -- and might like a long-shot of
5-1. How much do you bet then? In this article,
we'll look at some simple ideas on money management and bet
size. Please let us know your thoughts. The information on this site is for entertainment and
educational purposes only. Use of this information in violation
of any federal, state, or local laws is prohibited.
Money
Management Ideas
In previous
articles, SportsInsights has covered areas such as money
management, the ups and downs of sports
investing, and math
/ statistics. We have also covered important areas that can help
improve your results. These include shopping for the best
line, academic research
and contrarian philosophies (Betting
Against the Public) that SportsInsights highlights that
exploit the sports marketplace. We have also studied
one of the successful sports syndicates to get tips
and ideas that can help us succeed in sports investing.
Bet Size
for Point Spread Bets
If the odds for
a sports bet are close to "even odds" (say from
-115 to +115), a good rule of thumb is to bet
around 1-2% of your bankroll on each selection. For
the sake of this article, we'll use 1%. That is, if your
bankroll is $10,000, it is prudent to bet about $100 on each
play. This will allow you to ride out the rough times and
maintain your bet size so that you can regain your bankroll
during the inevitable good times.
Note that if
you don't have enough of an edge to beat the "vig" --
no money management approach will prevent your bankroll from
eventual decline. SportsInsights'
sports investing methods can add value to any handicapping
approach.
Bet Size
when Money Line Odds Vary
As we saw
above, it makes sense to bet around 1% of our bankroll on
"even odds" bets. However, what
should you do if some of your bets are +200 underdogs? Or
what if you regularly bet on 10-1 long-shots in boxing or tennis
or horseracing? Here are some good choices for bet size:
-
"Risk" the
Same Amount: Overall, this is a great method for
betting because you don't have to change anything; you just
bet the same amount each time. However, if you bet the same amount on a mix of games --
including point spread (or "even odd") games, as
well as money line games (including long shots) -- you will
feel that the performance of your bankroll is being dominated by the results of
the "large money line" games.
That is,
risking $110 on every play you make (no matter if it is $110
to win $100 in an NFL game -- OR $100 to win a relatively
large $250 in MLB or
$100 to win a nice $1000 in boxing) -- you will feel that
your
portfolio tracks the performance mainly of the large
dogs.
-
"Bet
to Win" Same Amount: Some people like to vary
their bet size so that if they win, they collect the same
amount. That is (in our example above of a $10,000
bankroll and 1% or $100 bet size), if they bet on a point
spread sport, they might bet $110 to win $100 -- and if they
bet on a +200 underdog, they might bet $50 to win
$100. If they like a -150 favorite, they would risk
$150 to win $100. This approach means that they will win the same
amount on a winning bet. Note, however, that this
method under-weights the wins of your underdogs.
-
"Balanced
Betting": If you don't want too much
emphasis one way or the other -- you can use a balanced
approach. A balanced approach would go somewhere
between "risking the same amount" and betting to
"win the same amount." When you place a bet,
try and make the average of "the amount to risk"
and "the amount to win" roughly equivalent to your
betting size.
Table
1: Bet Size Methods
| Bet Size Methodology |
Portfolio Impact and Notes |
| Risk Same Amount |
Over-weights impact of large
dogs. Ease-of-use. |
| Bet to Win Same Amount |
Under-weights impact of
dogs. |
| Balanced |
Good mix. |
Using
a Balanced Approach to Bet Size
We saw
above that if we don't want dogs or favorites to "wag the
dog" -- we can use a more "balanced
approach." This is a little trickier than the
more common methods we described above, but once you get the
hang of it -- it can become second nature. In essence,
for most normal ranges of moneyline bets -- we want the
average of the "risk amount" and the "win
amount" to be about your "betting unit
size." Here is a chart to help you compute and
estimate a good, balanced bet size.
Table
2: Balanced Bet Size (average betting unit is $100 / play)
| Money Line Odds |
Risk Amount |
To Win |
Avg of (Risk Amt, To Win) |
| -110 |
$105 |
$95 |
$100 |
| +120 |
$91 |
$109 |
$100 |
| +150 |
$80 |
$120 |
$100 |
| +200 |
$67 |
$134 |
$100 |
| +400 |
$40 |
$160 |
$100 |
| -150 |
$120 |
$80 |
$100 |
Disclaimer We do not guarantee that the trends and biases we’ve found will
continue to exist. It is impossible to predict the future. Any
serious academic research in the field of “market efficiencies”
recognizes that inefficiencies may disappear over time. Once
inefficiencies are discovered, it is only a matter of time
before the market corrects itself. We do not guarantee our data
is error-free. However, we’ve tried our best to make sure every
score and percentage is correct.
|